American Legal Culture
JLS. 225
§1
Professor Fagelson
Spring 2007

 


 


 


 

 

 
   
 
 
Classroom Forms And Other Important Material
  Student Information Form NOW LINKED!

Office: Ward 249
Paper Assignment  
Office hours M/Th 9:50 - 11:20 PM &5:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Mid Term  
Phone: 885-2372 (Call anytime and leave a message if I am not in)   Final Exam    
Class Web Site: http://academic2.american.edu/~dfagel/
 
 
 


COURSE MATERIALS
COURSE DESCRIPTION
READINGS


MATERIALS



Garvey & Aleinikoff, Modern Constitutional Theory: A Reader (4th ed.)


Arthur & Shaw Readings In The Philosophy of Law


Dworkin, Gerald Morality Harm And The Law


Strunk & White Elements of Style


American Legal Culture (ALC) Course Anthology (This book is NOT available in the campus store. Please see note below.)

Note: The books will be on reserve in the university library. The anthology readings should eventually be on electronic reserve subject to copyright permissions and library efficiency. The Course Anthology can be purchased online at http://www.custombookstore.com (type in my name) or by phone at (800) 228-8637.




COURSE DESCRIPTION

 




  1. Content








This course will critically examine the role of law in American society. We will consider the nature and authority of law, how we ought to interpret what our law is and the relationship of law to different visions of morality and politics. In addition to considering different ideas about the role of law in American society, we will also consider the way in which these different schools feel about specific issues of individual freedom, equality and the role of the state in regulating behavior. While readings may include judicial opinions from time to time, the focus will be on the underlying conceptual and normative questions which shape our understanding of what the law is or what it ought to be in American society.


Three underlying questions will be continually addressed during the course of the semester


What is law?



How do we know what the law is?



Why should we take any notice of what the law says?




  1. Skills





This course is designed not only to teach you the ideas of others but also to help you develop and present your own ideas. Class discussions will help you to articulate your thoughts on issues presented in the reading and to anticipate objections. The writing assignments are designed to help you learn to formulate your arguments clearly and concisely. Making the effort to state your meaning precisely in writing will help you in thinking through your arguments.




General Education Credit

PREREQUISITES: American Legal Culture is a course in The American University's General Education Program, Curricular Area 2, "Traditions That Shape The Western World." General Education Credit will be given if one of the following foundation courses has been completed as a prerequisite:

GOVT-105G Individual Freedom vs. Authority

PHIL-105G Western Philosophy

JLS-110G Western Legal Tradition








  1. Requirements



      1. Active class participation: all students are expected to attend class regularly and to be prepared to discuss the reading. Students may be called upon to participate in class and no passing is permitted. Each student will be allowed 1 un-excused absence. Thereafter, each un-excused absence will reduce your final grade by one level (e.g. B+ to B). Excuses for absences will only be given for documented illness or deaths in the family. Study the class calendar carefully to make sure that you don't have any prior commitments that would preclude you from meeting these requirements. There may be several unannounced quizzes on the reading which will be counted towards the participation grade.

      2. Each student will be expected to submit one paper each week of not more than 2 pages summarizing and critiquing the reading. Students should be prepared to discuss their papers in class. These submissions will be marked on a pass/fail basis and will affect the final grade in the following two ways: excellent submissions will be used to improve the final grade and failure to present submissions for a class will lower the final grade.

      3. There will be two analytical paper assignments (no more than 5 pages). You may revise either or both of the paper assignments in response to my substantive comments and Ms. White's comments on your grammar and syntax. Your paper will then be regraded and the new grade will replace the original grade if it is higher. The essays should be concise, neat (typed, double spaced), free of grammatical and spelling errors, and submitted on time. Use of a style manual such as William Strunk & E.B. White, The Elements of Style, is required.

      4. There will be a midterm and a final exam.

      5. Papers must be submitted on the dates specified on the syllabus. It is your responsibility to make sure that sudden emergencies do not prevent you from submitting it on time. Late papers will be marked downwards on the basis of 1 grade per day. Because you have the option to re write your paper for a new grade it is always in your interest to submit your paper on time even if the paper is not completed to your satisfaction. You may rewrite your paper for a higher grade but deductions for late submissions will also reduce your rewritten paper. While rewritten papers normally result in higher grades resubmitted papers that have not actually been rewritten will receive a lower grade than the original paper. Merely correcting typographical or spelling errors does not count as a re written paper. Students who want to rewrite their papers must meet with me first to discuss my comments and your ideas about the paper.

      6. Tests must be taken on the scheduled dates. The date of the final exam is listed at the end of this syllabus. Please make sure you do not purchase any non-refundable tickets home or make any other plans that will take you out of town before that date. Exceptions will be made only in cases of documented illness. When such documentation is provided, the student will be excused from that exam and the final grade will be calculated from the other existing bases for evaluation.


  1. Grading (subject to qualification described below)
 

 

      1. One Analytical Paper -- 25%

      2. Mid Term Exam -- 25%

      3. class participation (including short papers and possible quizzes) -- 25%

      4. Final exam -- 25%



  1. Standards
 
 
   

    Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical performance associated with each letter grade.

      A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject

      B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject)

      C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material

      D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material

      F: work falls far below minimum course requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material.


 

Here are some links to help you understand
what is expected in a philosophy paper.
You should pay close attention to these
suggestions because this style of writing
(and thinking ) is most likely new to you and
will take some effort to master.
.

How To Write A Philosophy Paper
What is a Logical Argument?
Preparing A Paper

 


  1. University and Classroom Standards

     

    The American University's "Academic Integrity Code" governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person's words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity code or see the instructor.



***************



Freedom of expression is at the root of academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge. This course will deal with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student's deeply held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored simply because it has these effects, students are expected to treat the differing views of others with respect. While a tolerance towards the opinions of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement, which are, indeed, encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content of the ideas expressed and not on the personal traits or values of the speaker. All class participants will be expected to tolerate the expression of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse about them.


I will endeavor to ensure that the classroom is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each student an opportunity to express his or her own opinions and to treat student opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not been given fair or adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussion is encouraged to bring this to my attention.


I am genuinely interested in student development and the generation of critical understanding of the issues addressed in this course. If you have any questions or problems and would like to discuss them with me, please call me, visit me during my office hours, or make an appointment to meet with me at a mutually convenient time and location. If problems arise that may affect your performance in this course (e.g. academic, health, family, or other personal matters), it is important that you bring these issues to my attention when they arise and not wait until they interfere with some class exercise such as a paper or an exam. I am eager to assist you in making this an interesting and beneficial educational experience.








READINGS






Author/Case

Source






part one: introduction: what is law and how do we know it?
Weeks 1-2

Austin,

  Province of Jurisprudance Determined  

Aquainas, from

 

 

    Summa Theologica  




    Riggs v Palmer  


part two: political foundations of american law: democracy theory
Weeks 3-4
 

Ely

 

    Democracy & Distrust  


West

 

    Critique of Democracy  

Burke

 

    Speech To The Bristol Voters  

Sunstein

 

    Republic of Reason  

Dworkin

 

    Moral Reading of the Constitution  

Bork

 

    Neutral Interpretation And Some First Amendment Problems

Legal Case

 

    Baker v. Carr (1962)(1)  

Legal Case

 

    Marbury v. Madison  
     
part three: moral foundations of american law: concepts of justice
Weeks 4-5

J.S.Mill

On Liberty

 

Dworkin

Liberal Community

 

Nozick

Anarchy, State & Utopia (excerpt)

 

Bentham

Anarchical Fallacies

    Principles of Morals And Legislation ( pp1-26)

Legal Sources

Declaration of Rights of Man

 

Legal Sources

VA Declaration of Rights

 

Devlin

Morals And The Criminal Law

 

Kristol

Gladiators And Community Values

 

Feinberg

HumanRights

 

Feinberg

Ride on The Bus

 
 

Legal Case

Dredd Scott v. Samford (1857)class website

 
 

Legal Case

Loving v. Virginia (1967)  
 

Legal Case

Lochner v. New York (1905)  


part four: theories of constitutional interpretation
Weeks 5-6



 

Schauer --

Easy Cases

 
  Bork Moralism, Moral Relativism And the Constitution  
 

Dworkin --

Matter of Principle

 
 

Brest --

Misconceived Quest For The Original Unicerstanding

 

Tushnet

Following The Rules Laid Down Part III pp 804-827

 
 

Levinson

Interpreting The Ten Commandments

 
 

Legal Case

Brown v. Board of Education

 
 
 
part five: perfectionism -- american legal realism & law and economics
Weeks 7-8

Langdell

Preface To Law On Contracts

*
 

Field

Magnitude And Importance of Legal Science

*
 

Frank

Realism

*
 

Llewellyn

Bramble Bush

*
 

Altman

Legal Realism, .......

*
  Murphy & Coleman Law And Economics *
 

Posner

Economic Approach To Law

*
 

Legal Case

Lochner v. New York (1905)

*

Legal Case

US v. Carroll Towing

*


 


 




 


 
part six: perfectionism ii: critical legal studies and feminist jurisprudence
Weeks 9-10



Gordon

Critical Legal Studies

 


Altman

Critical Legal Studies And Dworkin.

 


Legal Case

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)

 


Legal Case

People v. Liberta (1984) (NY)

 


Legal Case

State of Florida v. Rider 449 So 2nd 1984

 


West

Jurisprudence And Gender

 


Sherry

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 532-568

 


MacKinnon

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 559-571

 




 


 


part seven: freedom of speech
Week 11


JS Mill

On Liberty, Chapter 3

 


Sunstein

Speech in Welfare State

 


Dworkin

Pornography And Hate

 


Mackinnon

Only Words

 


Kristol

The Case For Censoship

 


Selected Cases On Free Speech

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)  


 

Wooley v. Maynard (1977)nbsp  


 

Texas v Johnsonn

 


 

National Socialist Party v. Skokie

 


 

American Booksellers v. Hudnut (7th Cir.1986)

 




 
 
part eight:: defining and regulating individual behavior: abortion and sexual orientation.
Week 12
 

Abortion, Right To Die Sections in Garvey

 

 
  Judith Jarvis Thompson A Defense of Abortion  
  John Noonan The Root And Branch of Roe v Wade  
  Randy Barnett Justice Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution  
  John Finnis Law Morality And Sexual Orientation  
  Ronald Dworkin, Nagel, Rawls, Scanlon, Nozick & Thompson Right To Die, The Philosopher's Brief  
  Michael McConnell Right To Die and The Jurisprudence of Tradition  
  Gerald Dworkin    
 

Selected Cases on Privacy

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

 
 

 

Eisenstadt V. Baird (1972)  
 

 

Roe v Wade (1973)  
 

 

Bowers V. Hardwick (1986)  
    Lawrence v. Texas (2003)  



Washington v. Gluksberg  

 
part nine: equality in america
Week 13


Minnow & Singer

Arthur & Shaw, 611-635

 


Bell

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 438-448

 


Posner

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 608-617

 
  Legal Cases

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

 


 

University of CA Regents v. Bakke (1978)

 




 


Wasserstrom & Sherry

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 523-538

 


Speech Creating A Hostile Environment

Arthur & Shaw, 655-663

 


Legal Case

Harris v. Forklift Systems

 




 
part ten: private property, freedom of contract and their impact on american legal culture
Week 14


Locke

Arthur & Shaw, 438-443

 


Nozick

Anarchy State & Utopia

 


Honoré

ALC Anthology, Property Title

 


Legal Case

Korematsu v. United States (1944)

 


Legal Case

Penn Central Arthur & Shaw, 454-459

 


 

Marsh v. Alabama (1946)class website

 


Cohen

Arthur & Shaw, 460-467

 


Fried

Arthur & Shaw, 468-475

 


Commodification

Dworkin, 145-161

 


In The Matter of Baby M

Arthur & Shaw, 476-484

 




 


Catch up And Review


 

Additional Topics

     
The Constitution And National Security
United States Department of Justice
 

 

 

 

 



 
 

Final Exam

   
       
 

 

         



 




1 All cases are in US federal courts unless otherwise indicated with a state abbreviation. Cases can be found on the Web at several sites including Lexis-Nexis,FindLaw, Cornell Law School ., & The Meta-Index for U.S. Legal Research Other interesting websites containing important legal documents include: The Founders Constitution and The Avalon Project at the Yale Law School