Justice,
Morality and the Law
Required: Readings will be made available as links from the Web site. Course Description Content This course
focuses on the philosophical grounding of various positions on moral
issues in the public forum. After studying two principal approaches to
moral questions, we will apply them to specific current issues.
The course will also examine the limits of law in enforcing moral
standards and the tensions between liberty and control. You will
be encouraged to develop and argue for your own position on these
issues.
Skills . It is assumed, however, that you will
have had some exposure to conceptual and normative (that is to say
ethical) reasoning. The course also assumes that you have the capacity
to synthesize information and present your own ideas orally and in
writing. This course will help develop further your analytical skills
particularly as they apply to legal and moral reasoning. This course is
designed not only to teach you the ideas of others but also to help you
develop the capacity to engage in original thinking and research to
advance those ideas further. Hence, it is absolutely essential to have
completed each reading assignment and to be prepared to speak in each
class.
* Active class participation : all students are expected to attend class regularly and to be prepared to discuss the reading. Students may be called upon to participate in class and no passing is permitted. Each student will be allowed 1 un-excused absences. Any additional un-excused absence will reduce your final grade by one whole grade per absence. Study the class calendar carefully to make sure you don't have any prior commitments that would preclude you from meeting these requirements. * There will be one analytical paper. * There will be one quiz a mid term and a final exam. Grading (subject to qualification described below) Class Participation: 20% Quiz: 15% Mid Term : 20% Analytical Paper : 20% Final : 25%
Standards: Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical performance associated with each letter grade. A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject) C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material F: work falls far below minimum course requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material.
University and Classroom Standards The American University's "Academic Integrity Code" governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person's words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity code or see the instructor.
*************** Reading
|
|||||||||||||||||||
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Week 1 | First Class Meeting | Readings for the upcoming class = |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Introduction
|
||||||||||||||||||
The Idea of Law |
|||||||||||||||||||
Weeks 2-3 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Bentham | Anarchical Fallicies | ||||||||||||||||||
| Austin | Province of Jurisprudance Determined | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hart | Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dworkin | Model of Rules | ||||||||||||||||||
| Riggs v Palmer | |||||||||||||||||||
Quiz: End of week 4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Weeks 4-6 | Quiz Returned: End of Week 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Mill, | Utilitarianism
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Kant | The
Categorical Imperative
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Excerpt from Science of Right | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Burke | Speech On The Reform of Representation In The Commons (from p.15) | |||||||||||||||||
| Rawls | Justice As Fairness | ||||||||||||||||||
Nozick |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mid Term End of Week 7 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| The Idea of Morality | |||||||||||||||||||
Weeks 7 -9 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Neitzsche |
On The Genealogy of Morals (Preface And First Essay) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ayer | Critique of Ethics and Theology in Language Truth And Logic | ||||||||||||||||||
| Brink | Moral Conflict | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mackie | Ethics: Inventing Right And Wrong. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dworkin | Objectivity And Truth: You'd Better Believe It | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Replies to Dworkin | Backburn Response | |||||||||||||||||
| Zangwell Response | |||||||||||||||||||
| Otsuka Response | |||||||||||||||||||
| Dworkin's Reply | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Problems of Dirty Hands: Terrorism And Torture | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weeks 10-11 | Paper Due End of Week 10 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Patrick Lee | Interrogational Torture | ||||||||||||||||||
| Walzer | Dirty Hands (The Article) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stanford Encyclopedia of Philsophy | Doctrine of Double Effect | ||||||||||||||||||
| John Yoo and Judge Bybee | Justice Department Memos on Torture | ||||||||||||||||||
| General Tagube | Report on Abu Ghraib | ||||||||||||||||||
| Geneva Convention Third Article 1949 | International Law On Torture | ||||||||||||||||||
| Bentham | What is Utility? | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hassan | An Arsenal of Believers: Talking To Human Bombs | ||||||||||||||||||
Paper Graded End of Week 12 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Human Rights And International Justice |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Week 12-13* | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Privacy: Gay marriage, Abortion, Stem Cell Research And Human Cloning | |||||||||||||||||||
| Week 12-13* | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Mohr |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
George,
'Same-Sex Marriage' |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Robertson,
Rights, Symbolism, and Public Policy
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Kass, Wisdom of
Repugnance |
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Review | |||||||||||||||||||
| Week 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| * One of the two topics will be chosen based on class preferences. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
FINAL EXAM
|
|||||||||||||||||